• Mon. Mar 20th, 2023

Group Biden slings bank BS — but you cannot spin this debacle


Mar 19, 2023

Charles Gasparino


Charles Gasparino discusses why the US economy requirements sturdy leadership in Washington through a time of many bank collapses.
NurPhoto by way of Getty Pictures

It is a funny but sad spectacle that Joe Biden &amp Co. are attempting to turn the mess at Silicon Valley Bank — and the crisis engulfing the banking technique — into a political win.

Funny for the reason that the BS is functioning about as properly as their spinning of the transitory nature of inflation, or how properly they handled the alarmingly chaotic pullout from Afghanistan.

Sad for the reason that it underscores the downright stupidity of our political class as they face pretty significant problems about the banking technique and the economy that cannot be spun away.

Of course, the final word has however to be written on the collapse of SVB, Signature Bank, the close to-collapse of Initially Republic Bank, and what ever else implodes by the time this column is in the ­paper.

But one particular factor I know for positive is that banking crises demand leadership from Washington — stuff that is so of course lacking at a time when it is so desperately required.

Back in 2008 we had Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson functioning day and evening placing out many fires and leveling with Congress and the American people today about the severity of the scenario. These days we have Sleepy Joe Biden, his equally asleep Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announcing that bank bailouts are not definitely bailouts for the reason that taxpayers are not involved.


Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen reportedly mentioned that bank bailouts are not definitely bailouts for the reason that taxpayers are not involved.AFP by way of Getty Pictures

The government just handed SVB a blank verify to cover all its depositors, mostly lefty Bay Region venture capitalists. That indicates all accounts are covered with FDIC insurance coverage, even these above the limit of $250,000.

He says with a straight face the funds is coming from the large banks who contribute to the FDIC insurance coverage pool. OK, but if the banks are financing the fund, they will pass on these expenses to depositors. That indicates absolutely everyone with a bank account, which indicates just about each American taxpayer, will be producing complete these wealthy VC dudes.


Not pretty ‘stress’ful

Biden and Yellen then say the watering down of the banking law identified as Dodd-Frank meant that midsized banks like SVB have been spared the so-referred to as anxiety tests that would have uncovered its weaknesses. They seem to ignore (or most probably have no clue) the dirty tiny secret that such exams are identified derisively in banking circles as “feather tests” for the reason that even large threat-management-challenged basket situations like Citigroup look to pass them.

One more whopper: Biden and Yellen want us to think that the San Francisco Fed had no concept what was taking place in its backyard with a bank that grew exponentially in 3 years ahead of it sank.

 Again, do not think it. SVB’s CEO was on the board of his regional Fed bank. Everyone who should have identified what SVB was up to did. And by quite a few accounts they have been as well busy producing positive the banks they regulated lived up to ESG requirements and embraced so-referred to as social-justice treatments to care about SVB’s clear threat taking. One of my sources worked at SVB till about a year ago, and here’s how he described the bank’s small business model: “Loans to VC-backed firms that made no funds, asset-primarily based credit lines to PE funds and tiny else. It should under no circumstances have been given FDIC insurance coverage. This wasn’t a place that produced loans to building firms and took deposits from your aunt.”

Biden mentioned the watering down of Dodd-Frank meant that SVB have been spared the so-referred to as anxiety tests that would have uncovered its weaknesses. Bloomberg by way of Getty Pictures

Yes, FDIC insurance coverage was supposed to defend smallish depositors like your aunt, not dice-rolling tech millionaires who banked at SVB and knew it was a risky small business. These tech millionaires (like the SF Fed) either knew or should really have known that a hiccup in the economy like increasing prices could doom this bank and perhaps other folks.

As I initial reported final week, the large banks are now freaking out about an additional midsized bank also in San Francisco about to succumb to market place forces named Initially Republic. (See a pattern right here?) They chipped in with $30 billion to stabilize the bank at least for the time ­being.

That is for the reason that I also hear the bank could be sold in the coming days to one particular of the bailout participants. The explanation they’re performing this is not necessarily for the reason that they believe Initially Republic is a wonderful small business — rather they’re seriously worried about financial contagion that policy makers have no clue how to deal with.

Keep in mind 2008?

The bill is coming due for the unserious financial policies of the previous two-plus years: The wildly unprecedented spending by the Biden administration to turn the US into a quasi-socialist European welfare state and funds printing by the Fed to make that take place.

Just about every top rated bank executive I speak to says the existing troubles in the economic technique could lead to anything on the scale of what went down in 2008. They’re also seriously worried the banking tumult is however an additional instance of Sleepy Joe &amp Co. not getting up for the job.

Or as one particular remarked to me: “Where’s Hank Paulson when you want him?”

Load a lot more…





https://nypost.com/2023/03/18/group-biden-slings-bank-bs-but-you-cant-spin-this-debacle/?utm_supply=url_sitebuttons&amputm_medium=internet site%20buttons&amputm_campaign=internet site%20buttons

Copy the URL to share