The new security law in Hong Kong, known as Article 23, has raised concerns among many foreign businesses about its potential impact on their operations. The United States has expressed particular concern over the vague language used in the law, specifically regarding the definition of “state secrets,” which could potentially expose executives and finance professionals to charges of espionage for simply carrying out their duties.

Despite reassurances from city officials that the law aligns with international standards and should not be a cause for worry for media outlets, the financial sector, or non-governmental organizations if they are engaging in regular activities, there is still uncertainty among foreign businesses about how Article 23 will be implemented and what implications it may have on their operations in Hong Kong.

The broad scope of the law has raised concerns about potential restrictions on freedom of speech and other civil liberties, which could impact the business environment in the region. While city officials are confident in the law’s alignment with international norms, the vague language and broad definitions have left many questioning how it will be enforced and what consequences it may have for their businesses.

Overall, there is a high level of anticipation and apprehension among foreign businesses regarding Article 23 and its potential impact on their operations in Hong Kong. Despite reassurances from city officials, many are still unsure about how the law will be implemented and what consequences it may have for their businesses.